Illusory Imagination versus Nihilistic Reason
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Combining Imagination and Reason in the Treatment of Depression
OBJECTIVE Computerized cognitive-bias modification (CBM) protocols are rapidly evolving in experimental medicine yet might best be combined with Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT). No research to date has evaluated the combined approach in depression. The current randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate both the independent effects of a CBM protocol targeting imagery and in...
متن کاملScience and the imagination in the age of reason.
The eighteenth century is commonly thought of as the "age of reason", an age in which the imagination was not given a central role in the arts, far less in science. But in Hume's attempts to account for our belief in a continuing external world he is forced into invoking the activity of the imagination. His views on the activity of the imagination greatly influenced Adam Smith, who adapted them...
متن کاملEcological intuition versus economic ”reason”
This article discusses the discount rate to be used in projects that aimed at improving the environment. The model has two di¤erent goods, one is the usual consumption good whose production may increase exponentially, the other is an environmental good whose quality remains limited. The stylized world we describe is fully determined by four parameters, reecting basic preferences "ecological" a...
متن کاملImagination inflation for action events: repeated imaginings lead to illusory recollections.
In two experiments, subjects heard simple action statements (e.g., "Break the toothpick"), and, in some conditions, they also performed the action or imagined performing the action. In a second session that occurred at a later point (10 min, 24 h, 1 week, or 2 weeks later), subjects imagined performing actions one, three, or five times. Some imagined actions represented statements heard, imagin...
متن کاملFairness versus reason in the ultimatum game.
In the Ultimatum Game, two players are offered a chance to win a certain sum of money. All they must do is divide it. The proposer suggests how to split the sum. The responder can accept or reject the deal. If the deal is rejected, neither player gets anything. The rational solution, suggested by game theory, is for the proposer to offer the smallest possible share and for the responder to acce...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Ars Disputandi
سال: 2002
ISSN: 1566-5399
DOI: 10.1080/15665399.2002.10819742